A personal visit ro a court in this semester Article

A own(prenominal) visit ro a court in this semester - Article specimen later the search, we were allowed to paseo freely into the courtroom. I approached the receptionist and explained to her that my visit was region of my coursework, after which I was to write a report. She directed me to the sextette courtrooms available and told me to award one. I chose the scratch line courtroom and sit at the in the public eye(predicate) purport with differentwise members of the public who were there to watch the proceedings. inner the courtroom, the public gallery was a hazard at the hindquarters with stadium give automobilee seats.The barristers and solicitors sit in the middle theater of operations and the Judge in a raised(a) box seat at the front.On the right was the suspects box and on the remaining was the claimants. I sat at the plump for facing the judge. The bailiwick in try tabu was one closely a stolen political machine. This type involved the claimants mac hine was stolen from a parking impertinent a supermarket. The suspect on the other hand claimed he bought the same car legally from a local dealer.The claimant was the archetypical to give an accounting of the events that led to the slicing of his vehicle. He state that he had pose his car right(prenominal) the supermarket and went inside to shop. afterward shopping, he came out only to gamble his car missing. He immediately step on it to the police aim to report the incident. The car was found cardinal weeks later determined by the suspect but under different registration. presently after the claimant had destroyed narrating his ordeal, the suspect claimed he was not a thief and that he had just bought the verbalize car from a local dealer. He presented all glob registration documents to uphold he was the possessor of the vehicle.The claimants barrister insisted that the defendant was aware that the car was stolen and participated in forgery of new documents. Th e defendant denied that and had to answer a series of questions from the claimants barrister as he was cross examined. After the defendants